"Which incidentally is not entirely unlike the situation in this perversion of justice." So true. I went through the Wikipedia article, and couldn't escape thi

"Which incidentally is not entirely unlike the situation in this perversion of justice." So true. I went through the Wikipedia article, and couldn't escape this feeling: 1) Some errors were made (faulty IT system). 2) Handling of said errors expands enormously into various reports, IT vendor denying their system is faulty, legal proceedings, criminal convictions "tainted" & overturned, etc. To the point where original errors almost seem irrelevant within the bigger frame of subsequent events. Imho all the mistakes were made in the processes concerning 2), and 1) is a tiny side-show at most. IT systems can fail, period. What matters is how that's handled.