4 ms·
Publish your private keys and be considered responsible for what is signed with them, simple really :) I am not a fan of blockchains but this is a rare case wh
by simplereally 3y ago
Publish your private keys and be considered responsible for what is signed with them, simple really :)
I am not a fan of blockchains but this is a rare case where they could be used to prove that the message is authentic by publishing the hash of the message (including the signature) in it. If the DKIM private key was published after the message was added to the blockchain then the message was clearly legitimate.
- rlpb 3y agoNo need of "blockchain" for that. Just do a hash drop to any publicly archived place, or use a timestamping service.
- remram 3y ago> Publish your private keys and be considered responsible for what is signed with them, simple really What makes you think that?
- simplereally 3y agoI am not thinking of anything, I am simply proposing a solution as I fear that DKIM rotation might end up being used for gaslighting.
- remram 3y agoWhat makes you fear that? This is a discussion forum, you can't state thing and expect that no one will ask why.
- simplereally 3y agoI never had such an expectation.