3 ms·
There's even more complications to complicate the complications ... "you need many reads to get consensus even for any individual base" Not necessarily. If y
by tosseraccount 15y ago
There's even more complications to complicate the complications ...
"you need many reads to get consensus even for any individual base"
Not necessarily. If you know that the minor allele frequency it close to 50% in related populations and you only have a few reads, say 6, and three are minor allele non reference and three are "major" allele reference (and the quality is good and there's otherwise low regional noise), then it's a good bet it's HETEROZYGOUS. You don't necessarily need a lot of reads.
"second, you have to deal with the fact that a human genome has two copies of any individual chromosome"
Well. Sort of. Men only have one Y chromosome and one X chromosome for instance, women have zero Y's. (a nitpick, granted). Disease sample often have 0,1 and 3 or more copies of a genomic area.
- epistasis 15y agoThat works if you're only performing a few such tests. But if you have an extremely accurate test, say 99.999% correct, and you apply it at 3 billion base pairs, then you're still going to have tens of thousands of incorrect calls, and no way to distinguish the good calls from the bad calls, without more data.