3 ms·
$1 megabuck per year is roughly 4-5 developers and nobody else. Yes, you can argue that some developers would work for less than that, but any programmers capa
by bsder 3y ago
$1 megabuck per year is roughly 4-5 developers and nobody else.
Yes, you can argue that some developers would work for less than that, but any programmers capable of generating a good game can then go get jobs somewhere else.
And you need art assets. And music assets. And sound effects. And ...
This is why there is no "middle". Earning $5 million on a game (not $5 million per year--$5 million total) is absurdly successful on Steam.
- johnnyanmac 3y agoA small dev team like this isn't working for 200k a year, unless we have aforementioned investors that won't want to invest peanuts. And to be frank, you don't need a 200k dev to work on such a game unless you're making No Man's sky or something that is at significant scale. A Dev in this position would take a huge cut but negotiate for profit shares. Likely very large if they are such a small team.
- messe 3y ago> $1 megabuck per year is roughly 4-5 developers and nobody else. In the US.
- whstl 3y agoThis is also assuming that those developers would be otherwise able to land 200k-250k jobs in traditional software development. Which is a bit rare today, as the bulk of people working in small games today isn't made of ex-developers, but of newcomers learning from tutorials with limited/niche experience. And maybe that's the reason it's hard to get an 1M investment, and the reason the market is a bit saturated.
- EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK 3y agoWhat developers? There is Unreal engine. If there are any developers, they work on web site, internal tools etc.