4 ms·
You would be much more credible if you said how China is “bad” (which is a moral judgement anyway). Instead you jumped straight to calling anyone who might dis
by kubb 3y ago
You would be much more credible if you said how China is “bad” (which is a moral judgement anyway).
Instead you jumped straight to calling anyone who might disagree “uninformed”, a “shill”, and finally you admitted that you don’t understand how someone can hold a different view than you.
It doesn’t inspire confidence in your analytical ability.
- Tainnor 3y ago> which is a moral judgement anyway There seems to be a certain subset of the HN population that thinks that "morality" is somehow a bad thing. Morality may be subjective and not "analytical", but it's also completely unavoidable to being a human person, and debates about moral behaviour are absolutely integral to human societies.
- kubb 3y agoThere seems to be a certain subset of the HN population that thinks they can get away with attributing an indefensible statement to others who didn't make it, and try to challenge them on it, but those folks shouldn't be treated seriously, just like Don Quixote shouldn't be treated seriously in his fight against windmills.