3 ms·
it is reasonable to charge for training, or require to work for some time if the training allows you to get a higher paying job. but the cost of the training, a
by em-bee 3y ago
it is reasonable to charge for training, or require to work for some time if the training allows you to get a higher paying job. but the cost of the training, and the time that you need to stay in the job afterwards need to be reasonable too.
for example in germany, a 3-month training allows a 2 year binding to the job. repay clauses only trigger if the employee quits voluntarily and doesn't have a strong reason to quit. i couldn't find anything about the cost of the training, but i guess this should be industry average. pilot training is expensive everywhere, and medical training can be too i guess. but i would expect the training should allow you to demand a salary high enough to pay it off in a reasonable time.
the first example in the article is clearly demanding to much. as is mentioned further down, $20,000 is the average cost, which for a two year binding would mean the cost/repay-value is about $830 per month. still seems high, but if the training allows you to demand that much more for your salary then it would be ok.
- Veserv 3y ago20 K$ of training with a two-year binding to pay it back is structurally a 20 K$ loan with a two year term and a clause demanding instant repayment of the entire principal in full if you quit. If the company is actually giving you 20 K$ worth of training and they just want you to pay off the debt then that can just be a regular two year loan. If you quit you still need to pay, but on the normal payment cycle. These repayment clauses are loans with extra employee unfriendly steps. Even bankers do not write loans like this for regular people. And when you need to learn a thing or two from bankers about financial ethics, you have made a grave mistake.
- em-bee 3y agoright, the instant repayment is wrong. i couldn't find much about that for germany in comparison. only one source mentioned a case where a court granted the employee the right to repay in installments.