6 ms·
>Nope, not always, and this is why direct democracy is pretty inefficient. People aren't experts This was also the Monarchist argument for not even allowing re
by pydry 3y ago
>Nope, not always, and this is why direct democracy is pretty inefficient. People aren't experts
This was also the Monarchist argument for not even allowing representative democracy (rule by "rabble").
Swiss laws are actually fairly decent while your American representative democracy proves that representative democracy really is rule-by-experts:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Series_of_tubes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Series_of_tubes
- sofixa 3y ago> This was also the Monarchist argument for not even allowing representative democracy (rule by "rabble"). And their premise was stupid because rule by inheritance has zero guarantees. A representative democracy can more easily have a meritocratic aspect to it. > your American representative democracy I'm not american, and they literally have one of the worst possible "democratic" systems, so shouldn't be used for anything else other than an example on what not to do.