4 ms·
There’s nothing fundamentally wrong about it. This is unnecessarily strong language in absence of an actual point. GP addressed your exact point: these things a
by tmpX7dMeXU 3y ago
There’s nothing fundamentally wrong about it. This is unnecessarily strong language in absence of an actual point. GP addressed your exact point: these things are seen as worth doing, to the point where it isn’t routinely questioned.
- AbrahamParangi 3y agoMy point is that literally everything falls into this category of “potentially dangerous under conditions of misuse” and so it is not a useful distinction.