3 ms·
Contracts are good, they are a proof of mutual engagement. Contracts that enforce only one position are not good - this is why we have string labour laws. A co
by BrandoElFollito 3y ago
Contracts are good, they are a proof of mutual engagement.
Contracts that enforce only one position are not good - this is why we have string labour laws. A contract in France cannot have anything that is outside the labour law. They are completely generic.
- matheusmoreira 3y agoI'm not arguing against the existence of contracts. I'm arguing against the position that people should have the "ability" to waive away their own rights. Such an "ability" inevitably leads to the boilerplate situation I described above. My country's laws work the same way as what you described. I've had lawyers straight up laugh when I presented them some of these abusive contracts. This "waive your rights" business seems to be an american thing.
- BrandoElFollito 3y agoThis is why I am not suggesting that people waive their rights - this should be completely forbidden because it will be used against them (and in France it is not possible for you to waive your rights, that part of the contract just does not exist in the eye of the law) What I suggested is to have another company take the burden of the training that happened right before someone left.