5 ms·
People's right to move to better jobs (by their own judgement) is more important than a business's right to never lose money. In fact, businesses don't have a r
by Buttons840 3y ago
People's right to move to better jobs (by their own judgement) is more important than a business's right to never lose money. In fact, businesses don't have a right to never lose money at all. A business can fail, that's okay, it's an important part of our economy that businesses fail. Let them take their loss, and let them fail if they can't find a way to succeed that doesn't involve financial slavery.
- paulddraper 3y agoYou seem to think this only benefits the employer. Financially viable on-the-job training benefits employee opportunities as well. E.g. if $CORP pays for my MBA, I think it's reasonable to commit to labor or payment.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- fatfingerd 3y agoSounds absurd and abusive to me. Companies should feel pressure to have good perks such as useful education that could be used elsewhere and if they can't retain people they certainly don't deserve a kick back for sucking. I don't want to play in a job market with parasitic companies full of indentured servants who are afraid to demand the wage correspond to their role.
- paulddraper 3y agoSounds like a system that will make upward mobility difficult.
- hotnfresh 3y agoNot a fan of moving back toward indenture systems, personally.
- paulddraper 3y agoAny explanation why or just preference?
- hotnfresh 3y agoMaster-servant relationships and onerous debt imposed on the weak by the strong are things to be avoided as much as possible. They’re repugnant. We’ve got enough of that as it is, without adding more and stronger forms for it to take.