2 ms·
Great article. nice job. In the response letter Arielly says that he got the data from the insurance company (with which he collaborated on this experiment) and
by yard2010 3y ago
Great article. nice job. In the response letter Arielly says that he got the data from the insurance company (with which he collaborated on this experiment) and didn't suspect a thing. What is the level of responsibility which is expected from a researcher? What should be the consequences for the researcher on such cases?
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> Arielly says that he got the data from the insurance company (with which he collaborated on this experiment) and didn't suspect a thing The insurance company confirmed the data Arielly represents he got is not the data they sent. Arielly is a fraud.
- andrewflnr 3y agoI'll grant that the motive is more obscure on the insurers side, but I wouldn't be so quick to take their word for it either.
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> I wouldn't be so quick to take their word for it Dan Arielly is a curious figure to give this sort of benefit of doubt.
- andrewflnr 3y agoI'd say the same for a random insurance company.
- User23 3y agoInsurance adjusters are straight-laced to the point of being anal. They go to prison if they're not. I trust them here.