I'm not saying that it's actually ancient, and neither I nor the original commenter was talking about the tree, or what it's famous for. Anyone who read the ar

I'm not saying that it's actually ancient, and neither I nor the original commenter was talking about the tree, or what it's famous for. Anyone who read the article already understands what it's famous for. I'm saying that the previous comment did not claim the tree was famous for it's ancientness. Their remark simply remarked upon what the title said, and by implication, anyone who would write it. They aren't talking about the tree, or what it's famous for. They are talking about the title author.