Absolute free speech is fine, IF it includes the right to agree-to-disagree. Agreeing to disagree, is the true boundary on freedom. We've seemingly forgotten t

Absolute free speech is fine, IF it includes the right to agree-to-disagree. Agreeing to disagree, is the true boundary on freedom. We've seemingly forgotten that. The internet can be a much richer environment, with non-homogenous streams of consciousness. Way, way too much agreement without boundaries, locks out streams of consciousness, that can add a lot of value to the system. Nobody and no-one realizes this is happening, people are happy with 'more of the same' for infinity. From my lifetime of obversation.