5 ms·

It's not at all. If someone was sitting there going "Oooh, jqpabc123 is into anime" then maybe. There are paid alternatives now, if you want to opt out of what

• RunSet 3y ago
  "The burden of proof falls squarely on advertising to justify its intrusions into users’ attentional spaces—not on users to justify exercising their freedom of attention." https://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2015/10/why-its-ok-to-block-ads/ https://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2015/10/why-its-ok-to-...
• jqpabc123 3y ago
  * There are paid alternatives now, if you want to opt out of what allows them to offer search for "free" then go use those.* Paying for search won't change the fact that 75% of all web traffic contains Google trackers. This is a fundamental violation of privacy that no one should have to "opt out" of. Basically, you value Google's business model over human dignity. https://whotracks.me/ https://whotracks.me/