2 ms·
It's a sentence fragment without a verb. "DOJ v Google evidence release" is a noun phrase. If you wanted to rewrite it as a sentence and weren't constrained b
by wyldfire 3y ago
It's a sentence fragment without a verb.
"DOJ v Google evidence release" is a noun phrase.
If you wanted to rewrite it as a sentence and weren't constrained by conventions used in headlines, you could rewrite it as, "Evidence released in DOJ v Google case includes an exhibit that the Judge called embarrassing [for Google]"
- Aachen 3y agoNow I'm wondering what that noun phrase would be in Dutch, since that would make it clear it's one thing and not a phrase with a verb inside. Maybe "DoJ-versus-Google-bewijsmiddelpublicatie gênant genoemd door rechter"? Any Dutch in here that can say whether that's easier to read than the English title?
- remram 3y agoThe problem is that all of "release", "calls", "exhibit", and even "judge" could be verbs, making this rather difficult. Especially if the title of this news turns out to not be an action ([This PDF is] ...) Even now it doesn't really make sense. This PDF is not an "evidence release", it is either evidence or a statement about released evidence. Unless that is a term of art in law?