3 ms·
No, it's not a great insight - unless you have not studied physics before. It's the standard context for thermodynamics (macro) and statistical mechanics (micr
by mikhailfranco 3y ago
No, it's not a great insight - unless you have not studied physics before.
It's the standard context for thermodynamics (macro) and statistical mechanics (micro) explanations. Sometimes called coarse-graining and fine-graining.
For dark matter there are 3 potential levels:
- micro would be be new dark subatomic particles (WIMPs), or sterile right-handed neutrinos in the Standard Model (see Turok);
- meso is macroscopic clumps of those particles (dark stars) /OR/ no micro, but dark conventional matter objects, like naked black holes, neutron stars or brown dwarves (MACHOs), or perhaps just lots of dust;
- macro would be the truly cosmological state of the whole universe (a stat mech theory over the micro/meso). Think dark matter fluids, and phase changes to dark superfluids, that might have MONDian effects on gravity at the galactic level - and beyond!
- nico 3y agoSo according to you, nothing that anyone has discovered before is a great insight? Now, regarding the dark matter issue, maybe there are more levels that models can be separated in. It seems overly simplistic to separate the whole immensity of the universe in only 3 levels
- mikhailfranco 3y agoIt was a great insight by Boltzmann, and his intellectual heirs. But that was circa 1877, around 150 years ago. It is not a great insight today. Please keep up.
- nico 3y agoYou mean it’s not a novel insight to you It’s still a great insight, regardless of who is remembered in history for coming up with it first
- mikhailfranco 3y ago[flagged]
- nico 3y agoSays the troll that has nothing to add to the conversation except crapping on other people’s ideas without actually saying anything insightful at all. Well done
- mikhailfranco 3y agoAll you do is repeat solipsism ad nauseam. Solipsism may not be incorrect, but is a very well-known dead end. Perhaps mention it once in a thread about consciousness, just to show the uninitiated that it exists. But don't bang on about it. It goes nowhere. It should go nowhere. If this whole discussion is a figment of your imagination (consciousness), then why participate?
- Kerb_ 3y agoNot gonna lie, GPT accusations, especially unsubstantiated GPT accusations, should be automatically flagged. There are better ways to disagree with a user, better ways to report GPT written spam comments, and better ways to shut down a conversation that you don't want to have.
- dbsmith83 3y agoIt was a great insight, but now it is common knowledge