2 ms·
> She isn't "forced not to". Google is forced not to. > I'm not sure why you can't see the difference here. Indeed. This is a poor analogy, but it seems kind
by RHSeeger 3y ago
> She isn't "forced not to". Google is forced not to.
> I'm not sure why you can't see the difference here.
Indeed. This is a poor analogy, but it seems kind of like the difference between
1. Aunt Becky is allowed to keep a diary with lies about you
2. Aunt Becky is allowed to show those lies about you to Susan
3. Aunt Becky is allowed to take out a newspaper add sharing those lies about you, in every newspaper in the world, for the rest of time
There's a gap between 1 and 2 where you can make an argument. There's a HUGE gap between 2 and 3.
- Turing_Machine 3y ago> There's a HUGE gap between 2 and 3. Definitely. With 1 or 2, the lies aren't in a searchable database accessible to (e.g.) potential employers, or any rando stalker with an internet connection. That's a very important difference.