4 ms·
You're underestimating because it compounds. Small gains in efficency lead to huge advantages in long term growth. 17% would be absolutely monumental improvemen
by ellyagg 3y ago
You're underestimating because it compounds. Small gains in efficency lead to huge advantages in long term growth. 17% would be absolutely monumental improvement.
- visarga 3y agoyet insignificant compared to how full automation would look, not 1.17x but 1000x but I can't find any automated AI tasks of critical importance, they all need human support