Eh, I guess I will argue it a little further. You absolutely are the confused party. Perhaps English is not your first language? You've provided the definitions

Eh, I guess I will argue it a little further. You absolutely are the confused party. Perhaps English is not your first language? You've provided the definitions for de facto and de jure but they don't support your point, at all - you still show a fundamental misunderstanding. If something is de facto legal, it means it is practically legal. That's exactly how I used it. I didn't say de jure as to say something was de jure legal would be redundant, and simply saying the word legal does not mean I said, or even implied de jure, as you rather ridiculously asserted. You're entirely and completely wrong here, and seem to have no concept of how these terms are actually used in practice. But since you seem to be the type who likes to argue for the sake of it, have at it. I'm curious how long you'll keep this going to avoid admitting fault.