> but making the open source project pay-to-play flies in the face of the spirit of FLOSS Ah, maybe I just do not agree with that spirit. The SBCL compiler far

> but making the open source project pay-to-play flies in the face of the spirit of FLOSS Ah, maybe I just do not agree with that spirit. The SBCL compiler fared well with Nikodemus Siivola's crowdfunding: http://random-state.net/log/3523852985.html http://random-state.net/log/3523852985.html At the same time I do not get how this is a problem for people to accept wrt software, while it is the common suggestion to artists in copyright questions on HN: go crowdfunding!