3 ms·
They should have seperate the liability software features like braking, accelerating, airbags etc on a seperate controller with a seperate team and seperate qua
by 3seashells 3y ago
They should have seperate the liability software features like braking, accelerating, airbags etc on a seperate controller with a seperate team and seperate quality focused goals. The savings in production, they came and went. Protection goals and protection effort..
Also
-use model based design? Dead link? It's strange reading old articles with the problem solving buzzards of yesteryears strewn in as recommendation.. Oo will save the day.
Wikipedia Artikel critcism:
"
While Model-based design has the ability to simulate test scenarios and interpret simulations well, in real world production environments, it is often not suitable. Over reliance on a given toolchain can lead to significant rework and possibly compromise entire engineering approaches. While it's suitable for bench work, the choice to use this for a production system should be made very carefully. "
- ahartmetz 3y agoCar manufacturers try almost everything to avoid the need to write code because they are terrible at it and don't (want to) respect the craft. Hence, tooling that promises no actual programming required. It's getting better, but the things in the article happened over 10 years ago.