5 ms·
It's the safest thing we can do to let some violent "ideas"/"ideals" spread, and then acting when they're acting on it only no? We've seen it with Nazi on Afric
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
It's the safest thing we can do to let some violent "ideas"/"ideals" spread, and then acting when they're acting on it only no? We've seen it with Nazi on Africans, Gays and Jews (alphabetically ordered), it ended up so well.
I'd say, the freedom of speech can't contain concept that put third party in danger, or that could limit the liberties of others, because bad ideas have always become sufference
- charcircuit 3y ago>It's the safest thing I am not arguing about what is the safest thing. A free society should be free to make themselves unsafe if they so wish. >the freedom of speech can't contain concept that put third party in danger, or that could limit the liberties of others If a free society is not capable of relinquishing their freedom, then are they truly free?
- lnxg33k1 3y ago...and I guess those part of the minority who instead would like to live in safety and health can also go somewhere else, right? Because how free is a society that hasn't come out of the clockwork orange I think we can't go anywhere with our conversation, also because you've ignored the part about "putting someone else in danger"