3 ms·
SNI monitoring is a reasonable compromise, and I think a healthy one: Your ISP doesn't need to deep inspect your traffic to Microsoft because it accepts that Mi
by ocdtrekkie 3y ago
SNI monitoring is a reasonable compromise, and I think a healthy one: Your ISP doesn't need to deep inspect your traffic to Microsoft because it accepts that Microsoft is doing something reasonable with it. It allows delegating authority which at least gives a path for investigation or blocking if necessary without seeking an extreme amount of transient information.
I would say if ECH is implemented the correct response would unfortunately be to MITM it if too many providers implement it to just block it entirely. I suspect large companies won't force it to maintain a wide customer base, and again, any reasonable network operator should just block anyone who does.
ISPs absolutely have all sorts of regulatory needs and network performance reasons to classify traffic. It's an unpopular view, but it's reality. (And I would encourage you to investigate who pays the people telling you otherwise, before someone links Mike Masnick here.)
- catiopatio 3y ago> SNI monitoring is a reasonable compromise, and I think a healthy one No, it’s not. ISPs have no right to know who I am speaking to or why.
- ocdtrekkie 3y agoI mean you have no right to use their networks either. You generally agree to terms as a condition of use of said networks.
- catiopatio 3y agoI didn’t agree to terms that require I provide them with plaintext traffic to analyze.