Guess I'll cite my sources, huh? https://youtu.be/6z4rhBKTT5U?si=LAieHjZIPzkQ2S8F https://youtu.be/6z4rhBKTT5U?si=LAieHjZIPzkQ2S8F Short version: he shows satel

Guess I'll cite my sources, huh? https://youtu.be/6z4rhBKTT5U?si=LAieHjZIPzkQ2S8F https://youtu.be/6z4rhBKTT5U?si=LAieHjZIPzkQ2S8F Short version: he shows satellite photos consistent with progressive damage to the dam (likely due to poor maintenance), especially near the collapse point, in the months prior to the collapse. The evidence seems difficult to fake with too high a risk/reward, and his argument from that evidence is cogent without overreaching like someone who was trying to be sensationalist. He also casts a bit of doubt on the Norwegian seismic detection claim (claim: heavy duty explosives plus a collapse should have produced two distinct bumps, while the trace only shows one), but I definitely remembered wrong on that particular point.