You would fail the LSAT with that kind of logical reasoning ability; just because something (y) might have occurred in the absence of a potential cause (x), doe

You would fail the LSAT with that kind of logical reasoning ability; just because something (y) might have occurred in the absence of a potential cause (x), does not mean that the claim that x caused y is prima facie false or "a joke". Trying to bury one's head in the sand about climate change, on the other hand, is of course arrogant and morally corrupt.