3 ms·

Don’t you feel it’s a privilege to be able to live all across the world? Most people in Europe can’t easily move out of Europe if they want to maintain a standa

Don’t you feel it’s a privilege to be able to live all across the world? Most people in Europe can’t easily move out of Europe if they want to maintain a standard of living.

oceanplexian 3y ago
I thought Europeans believed freedom of movement was a human right? Actually scratch that, it's a human right but not if a virus exists, you have the wrong politics, or movement requires the emission of CO2.
- tarnith 3y ago
  Hey, This doesn't ban ships. Just saying. Not saying I agree or disagree, but you're acting like limiting air travel would stop travel.
  - bobthepanda 3y ago
    Fossil fuel powered ships are worse, because the carbon emissions of running a hotel at sea are high and ships use very low grade fuel with all sorts of nasty byproducts. And electric or renewable long distance ships run into the exact same problems as electric or renewable planes, namely the poor energy density.
    - eptcyka 3y ago
      Transatlantic cruises don’t have to be luxurious. If you’re comparing air freight to shipping by sea, it’s very clear ships are far more efficient. We just need to become better at containerising people :)
      - andai 3y ago
        You vill live in ze pod!
      - bobthepanda 3y ago
        I mean at minimum you need to run an actual kitchen to feed people for days or weeks at sea.
        eptcyka 3y ago
        You mean? Yes. Yes, you'll need to have a crew and you'll need to need to ship the necessities, which eats into the efficiency of this mode of transport. However, a plane will create 40 times more CO2 for the same amount of cargo transported than a ship. I'd say we can figure out how to fit a larger crew and more supplies in that margin.
- eptcyka 3y ago
  I’m not against people moving or travelling, just pointing out that the vast majority of people won’t move out of their country, whereas HN audience is more likely to have lived in different countries. I have, will probably move again in my lifetime. But I still don’t believe it’s a human right to move countries at will, nor do I think we should be flying as much as we are, draconian lifetime budgets notwithstanding. But leave it to HN to read deep enough into a comment to make a straw man.
26fingies 3y ago
this is hacker news we dont do introspection here
patapong 3y ago
I am in a similar situation and have asked myself this. On the other hand, I think from an international peace and cultural exchange perspective, being able to live and integrate into other countries and cultures is very important. So many world-changing discoveries have been enabled by migrants and people who were able to spend time with people in the same field from other places. Imagine what we would lose if this was no longer possible!

Don’t you feel it’s a privilege to be able to live all across the world? Most people in Europe can’t easily move out of Europe if they want to maintain a standard of living.

oceanplexian 3y ago

I thought Europeans believed freedom of movement was a human right? Actually scratch that, it's a human right but not if a virus exists, you have the wrong politics, or movement requires the emission of CO2.

tarnith 3y ago
Hey, This doesn't ban ships. Just saying. Not saying I agree or disagree, but you're acting like limiting air travel would stop travel.
- bobthepanda 3y ago
  Fossil fuel powered ships are worse, because the carbon emissions of running a hotel at sea are high and ships use very low grade fuel with all sorts of nasty byproducts. And electric or renewable long distance ships run into the exact same problems as electric or renewable planes, namely the poor energy density.
  - eptcyka 3y ago
    Transatlantic cruises don’t have to be luxurious. If you’re comparing air freight to shipping by sea, it’s very clear ships are far more efficient. We just need to become better at containerising people :)
    - andai 3y ago
      You vill live in ze pod!
    - bobthepanda 3y ago
      I mean at minimum you need to run an actual kitchen to feed people for days or weeks at sea.
      - eptcyka 3y ago
        You mean? Yes. Yes, you'll need to have a crew and you'll need to need to ship the necessities, which eats into the efficiency of this mode of transport. However, a plane will create 40 times more CO2 for the same amount of cargo transported than a ship. I'd say we can figure out how to fit a larger crew and more supplies in that margin.
eptcyka 3y ago
I’m not against people moving or travelling, just pointing out that the vast majority of people won’t move out of their country, whereas HN audience is more likely to have lived in different countries. I have, will probably move again in my lifetime. But I still don’t believe it’s a human right to move countries at will, nor do I think we should be flying as much as we are, draconian lifetime budgets notwithstanding. But leave it to HN to read deep enough into a comment to make a straw man.

26fingies 3y ago

this is hacker news we dont do introspection here

patapong 3y ago

I am in a similar situation and have asked myself this. On the other hand, I think from an international peace and cultural exchange perspective, being able to live and integrate into other countries and cultures is very important. So many world-changing discoveries have been enabled by migrants and people who were able to spend time with people in the same field from other places. Imagine what we would lose if this was no longer possible!