2 ms·
what ? this is not flamewar? I am being completely misunderstood here.. I am not guilty .. dang - honestly, I meant to be fully supportive of prayer and I am d
by mistrial9 3y ago
what ? this is not flamewar? I am being completely misunderstood here.. I am not guilty .. dang - honestly, I meant to be fully supportive of prayer and I am deeply wronged in this sequence.. I regularly support religious topics if you read my writing
note: I will re-read the guidelines in an abundance of caution, but I repeat.. I am being misunderstood deeply .. this is not at all meant as some kind of problem thing to say
- dang 3y agoI'm sorry. I obviously misread you. Unfortunately, the comment is still a flamewar starter even if you didn't intend it that way, because it didn't make your intent clear enough. I wasn't the only person who took it the wrong way: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37709050 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37709050. If we had left it in its original position, there would likely have been others. The burden is on the commenter to disambiguate intent in such cases (I was just writing about this elsewhere - perhaps it will help explain: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37709303 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37709303). And as the site guidelines say, "Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive." https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html