2 ms·
a) Article talks about REforestation: re-growing a forest where there once was one, but currently not. Obviously, growing a new forest means carbon storage. b
by RetroTechie 3y ago
a) Article talks about REforestation: re-growing a forest where there once was one, but currently not.
Obviously, growing a new forest means carbon storage.
b) A good % of carbon gets stored in the soil in various ways. Some of that for a long time (if not permanent).
c) People have cut down a lot of forest over time. So restoring that would equate to a massive amount of carbon taken out of the atmosphere & stored in plant matter. Regardless of where it came from.
More plant matter = less CO2 in atmosphere.
Selectively harvesting trees may improve upon that. But it's optional.
- legitster 3y agoHow can that possibly be true? If forests were around for thousands or millions of years before humans started chopping them down, wouldn't the effective rate of carbon in the air be near 0? Clearly carbon was getting back into the air somehow or there is only a limited amount of carbon forests could ever have stored on the face of the earth.