> Why shouldn’t she? Maybe I'm still missing your point, but isn't the writing on the wall here? She's at the top of the hierarchy and her poor decisions negat

> Why shouldn’t she? Maybe I'm still missing your point, but isn't the writing on the wall here? She's at the top of the hierarchy and her poor decisions negatively affect everyone at the company. Why shouldn't she? Because the company is already bleeding money and employees. When Nintendo saw a financial downturn between 2011 and 2014, their CEO voluntarily halved his salary for two years. Why should he do that? Maybe because it shows responsibility and expresses solidarity with the rest of his workers. EDIT: spelling