> both are under much closer scrutiny than anyone else, and have bigger reputational risks than anyone else. People say this a lot, but why does nobody care so

> both are under much closer scrutiny than anyone else, and have bigger reputational risks than anyone else. People say this a lot, but why does nobody care so far? I'd posit the simple answer is "it's easier not to", but also that governments are happy to reinforce a duopoly they control. We already know both Google and Apple are PRISM members as well as involved in the international FIVE-EYES network. That never really stained their reputation, despite being a universal backdoor. Google has exploited and broken YouTube several times over, but nobody stopped using it in objection. Apple moved their servers into government-owned Chinese datacenters, and nobody protested it financially. The threat to their actual reputations is almost non-existent, from what I've seen. If people cared, we wouldn't be fixing FAANG's problems 10 years after-the-fact.