Yeah, but the original submission title (not the title of the article nor clearly based on the article) implied that in the US people are not supposed to (as in

Yeah, but the original submission title (not the title of the article nor clearly based on the article) implied that in the US people are not supposed to (as in by some medical rule) drive after having their eyes dilated. It was something like "Soon people in the US can drive after eye dilation". Considering plenty of people drive after eye dilation already and there is no rule barring it the title was weird and bordering on nonsensical editorializing.