3 ms·
The argument is about what caused the dam to fail. For some reason Russia haters are insisting the only possibility is an explosion. Photographic evidence sho
by m0llusk 3y ago
The argument is about what caused the dam to fail. For some reason Russia haters are insisting the only possibility is an explosion. Photographic evidence shows that Russia allowed the dam to overflow which caused the collapse. Only one thing can be true. Both possibilities are clearly the responsibility of Russia in any case. But unfortunately Russia haters have decided it must have been explosives and so the truth has become the enemy as is usually the case whenever Russia is involved.
- Ylpertnodi 3y ago...but what you replied to didn't mention explosives. I'm a .ru.gov hater, and I don't have an answer save that mentioned: if Russia hadn't have invaded, the dam would probably still be intact.