4 ms·
I've never heard someone confuse private sector with privately owned. What do you think is being traded publicly? (Hint: it rhymes with blownership)
by blackmesaind 3y ago
I've never heard someone confuse private sector with privately owned. What do you think is being traded publicly? (Hint: it rhymes with blownership)
- Zambyte 3y agoJust because the public can trade it doen't mean the public owns it. Just because I can (legally) buy a Ferrari doesn't mean I own one.
- blackmesaind 3y agoThe public have bought stock (a.k.a partial ownership of the company), so the public owns it. You have bought a Ferrari, so you own it. Having performed an "Initial Public Offering" (IPO) means explicitly that the public has purchased, at least in part, ownership of your company. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_company https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_company https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_sector https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_sector
- Zambyte 3y ago> The public have bought stock (a.k.a partial ownership of the company), so the public owns it. No. Members of the public can own stock. The public does not own stock. > You have bought a Ferrari, so you own it. No. I have not purchased a Ferrari, so I do not own one. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_company https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_company This link does not talk about public ownership. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_sector https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_sector This link talks about public ownership in the same way I have explained. You are not the public. You are a member of the public.
- blackmesaind 3y ago> No. Members of the public can own stock. The public does not own stock. Members of the public own stock, so the public owns stock. Your distinction here is pedantic at best, but generally plain wrong. > No. I have not purchased a Ferrari, so I do not own one. It seems the concept of a metaphor struggles to take grasp. I'll leave progress in this area to those certified. > This link does not talk about public ownership. It's very literally the first line. If you're going to be a pedant, be right.
- Zambyte 3y agoPlease explain the quote in my other comment from your source. It really just seems like you're uncomfortable with the fact that you're wrong about this, having resorted to name calling. It's ok, this really is a common mistake to make. I do encourage you to read the Wikipedia links you sent though. I think they do a good job of explaining what I have said. Just remember that individuals are not the public. The public actually owns national parks. The whole public as an entity. Actually I just found another Wikipedia page which may help elucidate this for you, if you're still having trouble with the links you posted. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_ownership https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_ownership I hope the first two lines will make things clear :-)
- WrongAssumption 3y agoThis is getting painful to watch. He is right, you are wrong. He isn’t being pedantic, he is being precise. “A public company is one that issues shares that are publicly traded, meaning the shares are available for anyone to buy and sell on the open market, usually very easily. Note that publicly traded companies are not publicly owned -- they are not owned or controlled by any government.” https://www.fool.com/terms/p/publicly-traded-companies https://www.fool.com/terms/p/publicly-traded-companies
- blackmesaind 3y agoYeah, you're right.
- p_j_w 3y ago
- Zambyte 3y agoFrom your second link: > In most cases, public companies are private enterprises in the private sector, and "public" emphasizes their reporting and trading on the public markets.