4 ms·
Well, the supposition GP made was that Security Experts AGREE ON ANYTHING. Which is a patently false supposition. Some warn, others ignore. Is true. It's tr
by imchillyb 3y ago
Well, the supposition GP made was that Security Experts AGREE ON ANYTHING. Which is a patently false supposition.
Some warn, others ignore. Is true. It's true for every industry, every walk of life, in every country, on the entire planet.
Experts, though, when have they agreed on anything, in any field?
One must ascertain for themselves which authoritative sources can be relied upon. The experts that warn of centralization are authoritative and masters in their fields.
Centralization in any other area of life tends to be bad for citizens, so I ask you this: Why would centralization lead to MORE security, or MORE benefit to the users and citizens of the world?
I'll wait...
- hnlmorg 3y ago> Well, the supposition GP made was that Security Experts AGREE ON ANYTHING. That’s not what they said > Centralization in any other area of life tends to be bad for citizens, so I ask you this: Why would centralization lead to MORE security, or MORE benefit to the users and citizens of the world? I had already addressed the point about centralisation and risk. This additional question you’re raising is, at best, a straw man argument. If you go back and read, and I mean properly read, pause and think about the comments being made, you’d realise that we aren’t saying risk doesn’t exist. We are saying the reality of that risk depends on numerous factors specific to each business, project, and even team. Thus you cannot distil “the cloud” down to a single truism such as what you keep trying to do.