4 ms·
You're making the opposite argument to what you think you are. Your points support that he should cut his $1m/salary to 0 and allow 3-10 other employees to stay
by greenthrow 3y ago
You're making the opposite argument to what you think you are. Your points support that he should cut his $1m/salary to 0 and allow 3-10 other employees to stay on.
- marcinzm 3y agoYou think I'm defending him. I'm not. He could take out a loan against his $5+ billion ownership stake to help keep 100+ employees on. He's not. He's prioritizing the future growth and value of the company despite having the choice not to. You however are too busy being distracted by the shiny toy to realize how much he isn't doing.