We operate under a shared framework that is ideally codified in law. The alternatives to codification are bad. If your issue is with the codification and what

We operate under a shared framework that is ideally codified in law. The alternatives to codification are bad. If your issue is with the codification and what is codified, you fix that through the process of updating that codification. Disobeying or being angry at the process because it doesn't match your preconceived notions isn't a reasonable response. In all societies, there are legal ways to subpeona someone at a border. That is not irregular or incorrect. "You are legally required to show up and talk to a grand jury" is not authoritarian rule. You can't just call every legal code you don't like "sham justice".