2 ms·
1. Then tomorrow you could argue human rights are violated. Not today. 2. So like I said: being able to run whatever software you want for more than a week at
by shuckles 3y ago
1. Then tomorrow you could argue human rights are violated. Not today.
2. So like I said: being able to run whatever software you want for more than a week at a time without having to click a button is the human right? Is that so?
2+3. I propose you start a human rights defending company that rents people a Mac Mini in the cloud for a minute a week and auto-signs any locally signed apps. All the necessary API already exists, and the marginal cost is in the cents. Cheapest welfare ever!
- Apocryphon 3y agoThey would have to rent for longer than that, per the SLA: https://www.apple.com/legal/sla/docs/macOSVentura.pdf https://www.apple.com/legal/sla/docs/macOSVentura.pdf > 3. Leasing for Permitted Developer Services. (ii) each lease period must be for a minimum period of twenty-four (24) consecutive hours; It also depends on whether auto-signing qualifies as a Permitted Developer Service, which sounds like it might- > (B) Permitted Developer Services means continuous integration services, including but not limited to software development, building software from source, automated testing during software development, and running necessary developer tools to support such activities.
- shuckles 3y agoGreat, 52 hours of rent a year! Marginal cost is approaching $1/yr. Still very cheap welfare if you think this kind of thing is a human rights violation. I'd be happy if the EU deemed these terms unenforceable. That sounds like it could allow for real innovation.
- Apocryphon 3y agoTestFlight was born out of sidestepping an onerous app provisioning process, so you are unironically correct. Would be nice if the EU weighed in on behalf of Corellium as well.
- shuckles 3y agoI wasn’t trying to be ironically correct. The EU doesn’t have to weigh in: Apple failed its appeal of the case.