4 ms·
And that's my point, Rails has a lot of functionality that it provides through a lot of dependencies. Exactly the opposite of the self-contained mini-framework
by ovi256 15y ago
And that's my point, Rails has a lot of functionality that it provides through a lot of dependencies.
Exactly the opposite of the self-contained mini-framework (if not micro-) it started as.
- tptacek 15y agoYour first sentence has nothing to do with my point, and your second sentence has a false premise; Rails was never a mini-framework.
- chc 15y agoI don't think it's fair to characterize Rails' early accusations against Java webdev as "The frameworks are too large." They accused Java frameworks of requiring too much ceremony, repetition and verbosity, but I can't think of many instances where early Rails advocates attacked Java for having too many features.