3 ms·
> There are plenty of techniques the military could use to make jamming or spoofing almost impossible. The US DOD is not as confident as you are, as they looki
by throw0101c 3y ago
> There are plenty of techniques the military could use to make jamming or spoofing almost impossible.
The US DOD is not as confident as you are, as they looking at backups/alternatives:
> DOD primarily relies on GPS for accurate PNT data, which is essential to effective military operations. However, multiple threats can render GPS data unavailable or inaccurate. DOD recognizes the threats to GPS and is taking steps to address them by developing more robust GPS capabilities and alternative PNT technologies. GAO was asked to review DOD's acquisition of alternative PNT technologies.
* https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-22-106010 https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-22-106010
> To fully block a military unit receiving GPS, the enemy would need to have ~30 planes in the sky over the unit, between the unit and each GPS satellite, broadcasting the jamming signal. Pretty infeasible for them.
All GNSS signals live on a finite number of frequency bands: L5/E5, L2, E6, L1/E1:
* https://gssc.esa.int/navipedia/index.php?title=GNSS_signal https://gssc.esa.int/navipedia/index.php?title=GNSS_signal
* https://www.geospatialworld.net/blogs/gnss-frequency-bands-for-constellations/ https://www.geospatialworld.net/blogs/gnss-frequency-bands-f...
* https://www.tallysman.com/gnss-constellations-radio-frequencies-and-signals/ https://www.tallysman.com/gnss-constellations-radio-frequenc...
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_navigation#Frequency_allocation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_navigation#Frequency...
> The ITU have allocated the following L-band frequencies to GNSS (bold are aeronautically used):
> *GPS, the centre frequencies are 1575.42 MHz (L1), 1227.6 MHz (L2) and 1176.45 MHz (L5).
> *GLONASS operates as frequency divisional multiple access (FDMA) and there are two operational centre frequencies 1602 MHz (L1) and 1246 MHz (L2) and at 1207.14 MHz (L3). GLONASS over this decade will also introduce Code Divisional Multiple Access (CDMA) similar to GPS.
> *GALILEO has a range of frequencies assigned in the L-band as follows:
> ** E2 – L1 – E1 – Centre frequency 1575.42 MHz (band from 1559MHz – 1591MHz).
> ** E5A – Centre frequency 1176.45 MHz (band from 1164 MHz – 1188 MHz).
> ** E5B - Centre frequency 1207.14 MHz (band from 1188 MHz – 1215 MHz).
> ** E6 – Centre frequency 1278,75 MHz (band from 1260 MHz – 1300 MHz).
* https://pbnportal.eu/epbn/main/Overview-of-PBN/PBN-Concept---Unpacked/PBN-Infrastructure/Space-based/GNSS-Spectrum-Allocation.html https://pbnportal.eu/epbn/main/Overview-of-PBN/PBN-Concept--...
A handful of planes (or drones) focussing on those few frequency ranges can do a lot of mischief.
And this is not theoretical, but observed events:
> Russia has been thwarting US-made mobile rocket systems in Ukraine more frequently in recent months, using electronic jammers to throw off its GPS guided targeting system to cause rockets to miss their targets, multiple people briefed on the matter told CNN.
* https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/05/politics/russia-jamming-himars-rockets-ukraine/index.html https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/05/politics/russia-jamming-himar...
- londons_explore 3y agoGPS guided missiles are a unique case, because there is a good chance the enemy gets hold of the electronics. Therefore, you don't want to put your military GPS encryption keys in there, because if the enemy got hold of those keys, they could spoof your satellites.
- throw0101c 3y ago> Therefore, you don't want to put your military GPS encryption keys in there, because if the enemy got hold of those keys, they could spoof your satellites. IIRC, I remember reading that the NSA has cipher(s) where the decryption 'algorithm' is completely than the one for encryption, i.e., just because you have the decryption code doesn't mean you can encrypt.
- m4rtink 3y agoSo normal public key cryptography? ;-)
- throw0101c 3y agoNo, this is for symmetrical encryption. So think something like AES, but where the 'distributor' encrypts something, gives you a key and an algorithm, and you can decrypt it. But you cannot use the same algorithm to encrypt to send back anything. For the life of me I can't remember where I read it (which book), so have never been able to dig into it more.
- inemesitaffia 3y agoPFS