>Do you believe otherwise? I referenced the documentary "Kink" from 2013 above about the BDSM studio with the same name. They have a part about how you smack s

>Do you believe otherwise? I referenced the documentary "Kink" from 2013 above about the BDSM studio with the same name. They have a part about how you smack somebody that it sounds good but isnt painful. Its a skill to learn. The whole perspective is counterproductive though. Pain can also be really pleasant if done right. Anyone who ever scratched an itch should understand that. This is likely a good illustration why simplifications are utterly counterproductive. You cant go for some simple checklist of what to ban. While BDSM stuff looks rough the actual dangers in sex work are too rough and unprepared sex leading to something ripping. That can be really hard to identity on video and horrific for that person. Which makes this so counterproductive. Signaling towards easy to visualize stuff means you have the exact opposite effect of the claimed intention. You dont go after known bad actors but people with spotless records that make sure to take care of the people they work with. Kink might waterboard you safely if you are into this sort of stuff but there wont be any surprise genuine attacks and pressuring by psychos with big dicks that sends you to the doctor like you will find it in some mainstream porn.