3 ms·
It seems that you have come to agree with me, but haven't realised it yet! You're saying that we must look at more than just the skewed sample, and that's exact
by calderknight 3y ago
It seems that you have come to agree with me, but haven't realised it yet! You're saying that we must look at more than just the skewed sample, and that's exactly my point.
- robertlagrant 3y agoI don't think that's correct. The point is you can't just dismiss based on selection bias. You could say that the survivors of the Titanic didn't want to drown, sure, but you're selecting for the people who survived. The people who all drowned might have wanted to! I.e. there's a balance. People basically always migrating in one direction must tell you something other than "those exact people just wanted to".
- calderknight 3y agoCan you please point out for me specifically where you and I disagree?
- robertlagrant 3y agoI'm a different person. But the previous person said "yes it is a skewed sample, but the sample is still useful information" and you said "exactly - we should look outside the sample for information".