4 ms·
I'll take the other side of that bet.
by sulam 3y ago
I'll take the other side of that bet.
- paulcole 3y agoHammering the under on # of blockbuster Richard Stallman biopics is free money.
- gcanyon 3y agoAgreed, but only because of the word "blockbuster," as there will be approximately zero of those within the 10 years (at least) the GP is proposing. I don't know for sure what the movie business will look like in 10 years, but one possibility is that everyone is able to create their own movies just by describing them, and a small number will say some variant of, "Give me a biopic of this Richard Stallman guy. Base it on his wikipedia entry and whatever else you know about him. Make it factual but an action neo-noir; you know what I like. Probably starring an amalgam of Bogart and Mitchum, the rest you can just make up."
- johnnyanmac 3y agoI mean, there are multiple Snowden films. I guess it depends on if you need it to be Oppenheimer levels of budget to be "blockbuster" or not.
- hutzlibu 3y agoI would think waaaay more people have heard of Snowden than of RMS. If a movie about RMS will get made, than in the shape of a crowdfunded community project.
- johnnyanmac 3y agoWell, yea. Because he metaphorically died in terms of US politics. It's one of the few bipartisan issues that sticks out like a sore thumb to the public eye. I hope it's far in the future, but we'll see how the media spins it when Stallman dies. They can easily sell him up as some Godfather of computers. Or it can just be a small whimper in the corner of HN. I'd still bet on something closer to the former, but it's not a sure bet.