> I define hunger as the ideal signal that corresponds exactly to the extent of starvation. If you redefine words how you please you can prove anything. What's

> I define hunger as the ideal signal that corresponds exactly to the extent of starvation. If you redefine words how you please you can prove anything. What's the point tho? > What do you consider hunger? The feeling I sometimes get that I should eat something. It's VERY subjective (for example when I'm fasting I can go a few days without it, but when I'm not - I get it just cause I'm bored and haven't eaten a breakfast).