4 ms·

You’re asking us to surf all of your supporting links instead of making a case on your own and then referencing these links, so I feel I’m just reading “No it i

You’re asking us to surf all of your supporting links instead of making a case on your own and then referencing these links, so I feel I’m just reading “No it isn’t” pleas rather than arguments. It was common for American whites to claim that laws against racial discrimination missed the nuances, with lots of knowing nods in the audience. You could search this yourself.

rramadass 3y ago
>You’re asking us to surf all of your supporting links instead of making a case on your own and then referencing these links Yes and for a very good reason; i don't want to bias your understanding of the matter with my own take/words. Given the amount of misinformation/insinuations/malicious agendas/emotional manipulations involved over this subject it is imperative that people read up on both the objective (Carnegie endowment article) and subjective (both pro and con articles) before trying to discuss/understand the issues. Hence i have provided a very small number of relevant links which can easily be read in a few minutes for personal edification. See also : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37701727 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37701727
- uhhhhhhh 3y ago
  Many similar arguments were made against laws protecting race and other classes we now legally protect. The supposed future actions of a bigoted few is not an argument that stands against refusing to protect another group or stand up against a wrong. Fundamentally cultural incomparability is not racist. Your arguments for, and tolerance of caste discrimination, are not compatible with western ideals. You may keep your views and culture and live how you like. I wish you and others no ill will. I will advocate for others around me to respect you while disagreeing with what you say or how you act in this case. Caste Discrimination is wrong and is not welcome in the society were currently discussing legally. If you require that ability, or the toleration of that, then you are not welcome in said society.
  - rramadass 3y ago
    Your comment is a very good example of what is wrong with the discussions on "Caste Discrimination" in the US; which is a lack of knowledge and nuance involved. Discrimination in any form (both explicit and implicit) is already illegal in the US and laws exist for its redressal. Workplaces can make it very explicit in their policies as needed. Hence any caste discrimination problem can be treated on a case-by-case basis rather than by a blanket bill which will paint a big target on the backs of a whole community for no fault of their own i.e. presumption of guilt will be instituted. This is even more important when you realize that there are malicious/vested interests involved which are at work to fracture and damage a hardworking and upstanding community who are in a upward trajectory in the US. Note that Google did not allow Equality Labs (and others) to do their rabble-rousing in the company due to these very reasons i.e. they would deal with it on a case-by-case basis if it happened. Last i checked, the Cisco case has also been dismissed as not involving caste discrimination. All evidence points to caste discrimination NOT being "widespread and systemic" in the Indian-American community. Pushing through laws/bills based on sentiment/insinuations is the very definition of Wokeism/sjw gone wrong. > The supposed future actions of a bigoted few is not an argument that stands against refusing to protect another group or stand up against a wrong. "Caste" is quite different from Racism etc. Most educated Indians in the US (and in urban India) do not identify with caste at all and as pointed out above it is not the problem that it is being painted to be in the US by vested interests. One should not institute make-believe fairness which may make matters worse when there is not much evidence of unfairness in the first place. I must again ask you to read and understand the points raised in my other comment here - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37701727 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37701727 > Your arguments for, and tolerance of caste discrimination, are not compatible with western ideals. You either have a severe lack of English comprehension skills or are deliberately insinuating things which i have not said at all (you owe me an apology). I have never argued for nor advocated tolerance for caste discrimination but am pointing out the lack of evidence on the ground for the same in the US. Your above line is the very reason why Indian-Americans are fighting against these sort of bills i.e. ignorance coupled with wokeism making decisions with no clue of what the consequences might turn out to be.
    - 3y ago

rramadass 3y ago

>You’re asking us to surf all of your supporting links instead of making a case on your own and then referencing these links Yes and for a very good reason; i don't want to bias your understanding of the matter with my own take/words. Given the amount of misinformation/insinuations/malicious agendas/emotional manipulations involved over this subject it is imperative that people read up on both the objective (Carnegie endowment article) and subjective (both pro and con articles) before trying to discuss/understand the issues. Hence i have provided a very small number of relevant links which can easily be read in a few minutes for personal edification. See also : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37701727 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37701727

uhhhhhhh 3y ago
Many similar arguments were made against laws protecting race and other classes we now legally protect. The supposed future actions of a bigoted few is not an argument that stands against refusing to protect another group or stand up against a wrong. Fundamentally cultural incomparability is not racist. Your arguments for, and tolerance of caste discrimination, are not compatible with western ideals. You may keep your views and culture and live how you like. I wish you and others no ill will. I will advocate for others around me to respect you while disagreeing with what you say or how you act in this case. Caste Discrimination is wrong and is not welcome in the society were currently discussing legally. If you require that ability, or the toleration of that, then you are not welcome in said society.
- rramadass 3y ago
  Your comment is a very good example of what is wrong with the discussions on "Caste Discrimination" in the US; which is a lack of knowledge and nuance involved. Discrimination in any form (both explicit and implicit) is already illegal in the US and laws exist for its redressal. Workplaces can make it very explicit in their policies as needed. Hence any caste discrimination problem can be treated on a case-by-case basis rather than by a blanket bill which will paint a big target on the backs of a whole community for no fault of their own i.e. presumption of guilt will be instituted. This is even more important when you realize that there are malicious/vested interests involved which are at work to fracture and damage a hardworking and upstanding community who are in a upward trajectory in the US. Note that Google did not allow Equality Labs (and others) to do their rabble-rousing in the company due to these very reasons i.e. they would deal with it on a case-by-case basis if it happened. Last i checked, the Cisco case has also been dismissed as not involving caste discrimination. All evidence points to caste discrimination NOT being "widespread and systemic" in the Indian-American community. Pushing through laws/bills based on sentiment/insinuations is the very definition of Wokeism/sjw gone wrong. > The supposed future actions of a bigoted few is not an argument that stands against refusing to protect another group or stand up against a wrong. "Caste" is quite different from Racism etc. Most educated Indians in the US (and in urban India) do not identify with caste at all and as pointed out above it is not the problem that it is being painted to be in the US by vested interests. One should not institute make-believe fairness which may make matters worse when there is not much evidence of unfairness in the first place. I must again ask you to read and understand the points raised in my other comment here - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37701727 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37701727 > Your arguments for, and tolerance of caste discrimination, are not compatible with western ideals. You either have a severe lack of English comprehension skills or are deliberately insinuating things which i have not said at all (you owe me an apology). I have never argued for nor advocated tolerance for caste discrimination but am pointing out the lack of evidence on the ground for the same in the US. Your above line is the very reason why Indian-Americans are fighting against these sort of bills i.e. ignorance coupled with wokeism making decisions with no clue of what the consequences might turn out to be.
  - 3y ago