4 ms·
Forgive the paraphrasing but: > Apple should seek to use its monopoly power on iOS browsers to take greater search revenue This couldn’t possibly end with lar
by Affric 3y ago
Forgive the paraphrasing but:
> Apple should seek to use its monopoly power on iOS browsers to take greater search revenue
This couldn’t possibly end with large suits.
And after:
> Google are bad for privacy
This article is nuts.
- stouset 3y agoCan you expand on how you believe Google is privacy-promoting?
- Affric 3y agoInteresting that you got that from me suggesting it was nuts for Apple to wade deeper into the mire of search and advertising.
- stouset 3y agoI got that from you saying “this article is nuts” in response to a statement—which you directly quoted—that “Google are bad for privacy”.
- Affric 3y agoIt’s interesting that you continue to not read my comment. The first thing written there is “forgive the paraphrasing”. Indicating I am not directly quoting. And the part of my comment you are referring to is entirely contextualised by the words preceding it.
- belltaco 3y ago> This couldn’t possibly end with large suits How is their current system using monopoly power to boost another monopoly worse than supporting an underdog in the search market?
- Affric 3y agoNot what I have said at all. I actually think Apple should have less to do with search funnily enough.
- 1270018080 3y agoGoogle is undeniably bad for privacy. That’s the whole reason they pay a premium to be the default search.
- Affric 3y agoThey key part you have chosen to ignore is: > "And after:" This indicates that the article is nuts for suggesting Apple should attempt to get deeper into advertising and search while decrying Google's model. Getting deeper into advertising and search can only erode the part of the company that believes in any rights that the user has.