3 ms·
I don't see how it's a valuable work finding out what your org actually needed if the cost compared to a proper programmer [team] is 3x - 10x more. I mean I ge
by pdimitar 3y ago
I don't see how it's a valuable work finding out what your org actually needed if the cost compared to a proper programmer [team] is 3x - 10x more.
I mean I get what you're saying but finding one senior dev and onboarding him into the business and using him as a litmus test for most of your ideas as your concept evolves seems like the more sensible and cheaper option.
- Brian_K_White 3y agoThe most valuable code is the 2 or 3 prototypes you intentionally wrote in python and throw entirely away. The no-code could easily fall into the same category, as valuable hashing-out process. Any "proper programmer" should know this.
- pdimitar 3y agoI as "a proper programmer" also include cost analysis, which was the main argument given by my parent poster.
- The_Colonel 3y ago> I don't see how it's a valuable work finding out what your org actually needed if the cost compared to a proper programmer [team] is 3x - 10x more. They seem to be talking about building real production systems using no-code. Building a prototype using no-code can be faster (at least in some cases) than coding them. Esp. if you consider the cross-org coordination needed to get an allocation for dev team.