> My argument is that the cost of the workers where I live is at least worth $20 an hour. How far are you willing to quantify "where I live" geographically? Is

> My argument is that the cost of the workers where I live is at least worth $20 an hour. How far are you willing to quantify "where I live" geographically? Is it just CA? Should OR, AZ, NV all have the same policy? What about Mexico? Why $20? Why not $22? Why not $1876436? > The local government expects a certain amount of tax revenue from wages and since you're not willing to pay that cost of doing business you can go elsewhere. The government could just as well increase sales tax? Why choose a policy that increases unemployment and drives out tax-paying inhabitants?