My bad. > That's exactly the problem - codegen means a lot of things. You just talk about codegen and expect people to understand that you mean the AI vomit.

My bad. > That's exactly the problem - codegen means a lot of things. You just talk about codegen and expect people to understand that you mean the AI vomit. I took the "you" as more general here. It's not your comment (that came afterwards) mentioning codegen that is under discussion, but the article, and it it uses it that word exactly that way, and only that way.