3 ms·
No. My argument is that the cost of the workers where I live is at least worth $20 an hour. If you're not willing to pay them that then I don't really care abou
by hparadiz 3y ago
No. My argument is that the cost of the workers where I live is at least worth $20 an hour. If you're not willing to pay them that then I don't really care about your business. It's not worth giving you a business license to operate for you're not willing to agree that the labor here is worth this much. The local government expects a certain amount of tax revenue from wages and since you're not willing to pay that cost of doing business you can go elsewhere. Someone else will be happy to take over the location. We don't need you.
- hellojesus 3y ago> My argument is that the cost of the workers where I live is at least worth $20 an hour. How far are you willing to quantify "where I live" geographically? Is it just CA? Should OR, AZ, NV all have the same policy? What about Mexico? Why $20? Why not $22? Why not $1876436? > The local government expects a certain amount of tax revenue from wages and since you're not willing to pay that cost of doing business you can go elsewhere. The government could just as well increase sales tax? Why choose a policy that increases unemployment and drives out tax-paying inhabitants?
- hparadiz 3y agoWe've set the price. Take it or leave it. Be happy we haven't increased it more. If you can't handle that you're too poor for us.