3 ms·
I'd cite the Apache Software Foundation. * Unlike many other tech foundations, it's a 501(c)(3) charity, which dramatically limits the ability of industry tita
by rectang 3y ago
I'd cite the Apache Software Foundation.
* Unlike many other tech foundations, it's a 501(c)(3) charity, which dramatically limits the ability of industry titans to buy influence — since donations are tax deductible and thus cannot be used to unduly advantage any commercial entity.
* The Board of Directors is elected by the "Membership", which is primarily comprised of individuals who have contributed the most towards ASF projects. It's a sort of co-op structure which ensures that the org stays aligned to the interests of certain stakeholders.
(FWIW I used to be very involved at the ASF but have not been active for several years.)
I've often wondered whether an analogous charitable organization owned by musicians could slot into music distribution, in the space of DistroKid / TuneCore / CDBaby — handling royalties, QC'ing releases, and bargaining with audience-facing distributors like Spotify, Amazon, Apple, etc.
- bombcar 3y agoIt can work and there are some organizations run that way. But just because something is a charity with a Board of Directors doesn't mean it can't be looted in various ways. It's happened before and will happen again.